It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

What people are working on at the moment
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15157
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#31 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Nick »

I used two of these

https://uk.farnell.com/vishay/f339mx263 ... dp/1902188

Use spice to decide what value you want to use, or follow Andrews path and send yourself mad trying to find a way to avoid the caps.
Little known fact, coherent thought can destructively interfere with itself leaving no thought at all, that’s why I prefer incoherent thought.
Andrew
Eternally single
Posts: 4200
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 2:18 pm

#32 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Andrew »

Nick wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:59 pm I used two of these

https://uk.farnell.com/vishay/f339mx263 ... dp/1902188

Use spice to decide what value you want to use, or follow Andrews path and send yourself mad trying to find a way to avoid the caps.
If you drive it with matching Z you can terminate with a high Z, I think that approach is viable at 1k5, but 600R certainly makes things harder. To do this you need chokes that are happy at anode DC. A matching termination and those aforementioned huge caps avoid such issues and the sound quality of the solution speaks for itself.

My almost certain mistake was I terminated the LCR with 3Meg3 then used a really really tiny terminating cap and grid leak bias'd the second valve which was a D3A. The very high grid Z was a source of noise due to strays, it doesn't take much stray current to generate hum/noise across a 3Meg3 resistor which then gets multiplied up by the gain of the second stage.

On top of that, I should note that my experience with the D3A is mixed, they used to have good availability but they aren't very robust valves, they have a tendency to go noisy, loose vacuum or in my case go into thermal runaway, if run hard, which is what happens in grid leak bias.
Analogue, the lost world that lies between 0 and 1.
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15157
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#33 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Nick »

I guess you could use a interstage, but again I think you are assuming the problem exists that needs a solution. I guess you could use a small cap into a high impedance buffer such as a op amp with voltage protection clamps on its inputs.
Little known fact, coherent thought can destructively interfere with itself leaving no thought at all, that’s why I prefer incoherent thought.
User avatar
IslandPink
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9913
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#34 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by IslandPink »

Re. D3a ,They are a lot more expensive than they used to be, as well.
"Forever fair ... and I'm touching your hair. I wish we could be dreaming .... in this dream" ( Morrison )
Andrew
Eternally single
Posts: 4200
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 2:18 pm

#35 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Andrew »

Nick wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 6:50 pm I guess you could use a interstage, but again I think you are assuming the problem exists that needs a solution. I guess you could use a small cap into a high impedance buffer such as a op amp with voltage protection clamps on its inputs.
A lot of the Japanese "DIY" designs of yesteryear used transformers, one advantage is the impedance "goes up" with the square of the ratio, making a "good" engineering solution, but the price goes up accordingly, everything has a cost!
Last edited by Andrew on Wed Feb 22, 2023 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Analogue, the lost world that lies between 0 and 1.
Andrew
Eternally single
Posts: 4200
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 2:18 pm

#36 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Andrew »

IslandPink wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 6:52 pm Re. D3a ,They are a lot more expensive than they used to be, as well.
Haven't looked recently, usually paid above a fiver for mine.
Analogue, the lost world that lies between 0 and 1.
User avatar
IslandPink
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9913
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#37 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by IslandPink »

Ha !
How about £25 each nowadays ?
"Forever fair ... and I'm touching your hair. I wish we could be dreaming .... in this dream" ( Morrison )
Andrew
Eternally single
Posts: 4200
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 2:18 pm

#38 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Andrew »

IslandPink wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 7:04 pm Ha !
How about £25 each nowadays ?
I should have bought more :roll:
Analogue, the lost world that lies between 0 and 1.
User avatar
Thermionic Idler
Old Hand
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:22 pm
Location: Southsea

#39 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Thermionic Idler »

Nick wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 6:50 pm I guess you could use a interstage, but again I think you are assuming the problem exists that needs a solution. I guess you could use a small cap into a high impedance buffer such as a op amp with voltage protection clamps on its inputs.
Now there's an idea, I think the OPA161x series that I used in the linestage has them built in...
Deck: Garrard 301 - Audio Origami PU7 - VdH Black Beauty
Phono: Pete Millett LR, Lundahl SUT, AMB σ22 PSU
Linestage: Bruno Putzeys Balanced Pre + Hans Polak relay mod, LCDuino control
Power amps: 300B PP 'Symmetric Reichert'
Speakers: FF225WK Big Mets
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15157
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#40 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Nick »

Thermionic Idler wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 7:23 pm
Nick wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 6:50 pm I guess you could use a interstage, but again I think you are assuming the problem exists that needs a solution. I guess you could use a small cap into a high impedance buffer such as a op amp with voltage protection clamps on its inputs.
Now there's an idea, I think the OPA161x series that I used in the linestage has them built in...
I would not trust them with 150v on the input.
Little known fact, coherent thought can destructively interfere with itself leaving no thought at all, that’s why I prefer incoherent thought.
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5256
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#41 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by simon »

Andrew wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 7:12 pm
IslandPink wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 7:04 pm Ha !
How about £25 each nowadays ?
I should have bought more :roll:
Mmmm yes. Just had a quick look and £25 might be a bit low. C3g look even worse. Wish I'd bought a good few more of a few valves now, it's beginning to become prohibitively expensive to use valves now. The popular ones anyway.
User avatar
IslandPink
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9913
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#42 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by IslandPink »

Damn about C3g's too. There are also C3o's out there that I think are like the C3g, but with a 20V heater, like the C3m.
I think they were pretty rare even years ago, though.
"Forever fair ... and I'm touching your hair. I wish we could be dreaming .... in this dream" ( Morrison )
Andrew
Eternally single
Posts: 4200
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 2:18 pm

#43 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Andrew »

In the days when we all started out, I bought 25, or so, D3A for a bargain price from a chap in Oz, it was a group buy, they are were a really good deal, sadly at least 20% of them were dead on arrival, white as a sheet inside :( We split the bad ones amongst the group buy, any survivors are probably worth 8x that now.
Analogue, the lost world that lies between 0 and 1.
User avatar
Thermionic Idler
Old Hand
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:22 pm
Location: Southsea

#44 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Thermionic Idler »

Nick wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 8:28 pm
Thermionic Idler wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 7:23 pm
Nick wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 6:50 pm I guess you could use a interstage, but again I think you are assuming the problem exists that needs a solution. I guess you could use a small cap into a high impedance buffer such as a op amp with voltage protection clamps on its inputs.
Now there's an idea, I think the OPA161x series that I used in the linestage has them built in...
I would not trust them with 150v on the input.
But the smaller sized cap you mentioned would be blocking that wouldn't it?
Deck: Garrard 301 - Audio Origami PU7 - VdH Black Beauty
Phono: Pete Millett LR, Lundahl SUT, AMB σ22 PSU
Linestage: Bruno Putzeys Balanced Pre + Hans Polak relay mod, LCDuino control
Power amps: 300B PP 'Symmetric Reichert'
Speakers: FF225WK Big Mets
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15157
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#45 Re: It's time I built a D3a -> 5687 phonostage

Post by Nick »

Eventually yes.
Little known fact, coherent thought can destructively interfere with itself leaving no thought at all, that’s why I prefer incoherent thought.
Post Reply