C3g Aikido Phono
#46 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
Worth saying that early versions of LCR's I built had the same problem I am describing here. Pentodes are certainly better at low loads after all but I eventually went with cathode follower with feedback into the LCR. And yes pentodes are more stable.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- IslandPink
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10041
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Denbigh, N.Wales
#47 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
You do seem a bit rusty Andrew !Andrew wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:57 pmErr, I'm a bit rusty, so I would need to think that thru'!
I wonder, out aloud, if you might need to increase the anode load on the pentode if you did that? The pentode load matches the impedance looking into the network. Wouldn't it now need to match the impedance looking into the series resistor plus the network?
Let's say you scale up the RIAA to about 20 or 22k effective. This allows the first RIAA cap to be 0.1uF.
The 'R1' input resistor ( as per all-in-one RIAA nomenclature ) is now around 22k.
Of course, for any finite drive impedance, this is included in the calc. So for mine I have about 2k Zout from my D3a, then 20k resistor.
In Simon's case, he would probably stick with the 5k6 anode load on the C3g ( for gain reasons ) then add an in-line resistor of about 15 k or 16k.
As for the coupling cap location, one advantage of having it after the RIAA is that the RIAA caps are then biased up by a signifcant voltage which ought to make them less prone to noise caused by any loose layer winding and voltages either side of zero. I don't know if anyone ever did any measurements on that, but it's the way I'v always done it.
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
#48 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
Yes scale the network to match.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
-
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5600
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
#49 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
So, add a 15k or 16k resistor before the RIAA, change the 470nF and 47nF caps for 100nf and 10nF, and the 680R and 68R resistors for 3200R and 320R? And the 1068R for 5020R? Is it that simple?IslandPink wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:14 pm Let's say you scale up the RIAA to about 20 or 22k effective. This allows the first RIAA cap to be 0.1uF.
The 'R1' input resistor ( as per all-in-one RIAA nomenclature ) is now around 22k.
Of course, for any finite drive impedance, this is included in the calc. So for mine I have about 2k Zout from my D3a, then 20k resistor.
In Simon's case, he would probably stick with the 5k6 anode load on the C3g ( for gain reasons ) then add an in-line resistor of about 15 k or 16k.
- IslandPink
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10041
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Denbigh, N.Wales
#50 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
I think so yes. Maybe Andrew can comment on one thing - is the 1068R in your circuit a little trick to make the second RIAA cap a stock value ?
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
#51 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
Nick said what I thought was the case, or perhaps what I didn't describe very well, you need to scale the network to matchIslandPink wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:14 pmYou do seem a bit rusty Andrew !Andrew wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:57 pmErr, I'm a bit rusty, so I would need to think that thru'!
I wonder, out aloud, if you might need to increase the anode load on the pentode if you did that? The pentode load matches the impedance looking into the network. Wouldn't it now need to match the impedance looking into the series resistor plus the network?
Let's say you scale up the RIAA to about 20 or 22k effective. This allows the first RIAA cap to be 0.1uF.
The 'R1' input resistor ( as per all-in-one RIAA nomenclature ) is now around 22k.
Of course, for any finite drive impedance, this is included in the calc. So for mine I have about 2k Zout from my D3a, then 20k resistor.
In Simon's case, he would probably stick with the 5k6 anode load on the C3g ( for gain reasons ) then add an in-line resistor of about 15 k or 16k.
As for the coupling cap location, one advantage of having it after the RIAA is that the RIAA caps are then biased up by a signifcant voltage which ought to make them less prone to noise caused by any loose layer winding and voltages either side of zero. I don't know if anyone ever did any measurements on that, but it's the way I'v always done it.
The network, including any additional series resistance, needs to match the driving load, or the terminating load.
Last edited by Andrew on Mon Jan 30, 2023 8:31 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Analogue, the lost world that lies between 0 and 1.
#52 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
Yes, it's all stock values and if I recall the 68R in series with the 1k adds a touch of nice bass lift, which compensates for speaker roll off and other lossesIslandPink wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 7:49 pm I think so yes. Maybe Andrew can comment on one thing - is the 1068R in your circuit a little trick to make the second RIAA cap a stock value ?
I shall have to get the Spice out.
Analogue, the lost world that lies between 0 and 1.
#53 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
Yes, kind of, but your'e better getting Spice out, to double check. Don't make life harder than it has to be.
Analogue, the lost world that lies between 0 and 1.
-
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5600
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
#54 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
I'd have to learn Spice first sadly
#55 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
Why, we are not talking about a transmission line. You are still thinking about LCR's. Just make the anode resistor right for the valve, 5k6 seems fine, then make the load > 10 times the source impedance and forget about it after that.The network, including any additional series resistance, needs to match the driving load, or the terminating load.
And even for a LCR they only need to be either driven or terminated by their characteristic impedance and thats easy with a resistor on the end and a low impedance driver. Trying to match the driver to the LCR sounds like a good idea in principle, but harder than a fixed value resistor.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
#56 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
Sounds like a good idea, but IMHO is a solution in search of a problem. I would just use polystyrene instead of film and foil and not bother as they are potted. I just prefer the relative cheapness that the RS polystyrene 63v ones give, and the fact they are 1% tolerance and cheap enough to buy 10 and select the best pair for the price of a pair of caps from HiFi Collective.As for the coupling cap location, one advantage of having it after the RIAA is that the RIAA caps are then biased up by a signifcant voltage which ought to make them less prone to noise caused by any loose layer winding and voltages either side of zero. I don't know if anyone ever did any measurements on that, but it's the way I'v always done it.
Also, any microphonics in the cap is likely to be swamped by the same in the valve.
For me the accuracy and even more important the channel matching of the RIAA is above any other consideration. Save the good film caps for the coupling positions.
But I have become cynical.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- IslandPink
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10041
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Denbigh, N.Wales
#57 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
Yes, maybe so !
I tried polystyrene ( 2 types ) in the upper RIAA turn and didn't like them that much. Maybe it's my fault for using ribbon tweeters.
I tried polystyrene ( 2 types ) in the upper RIAA turn and didn't like them that much. Maybe it's my fault for using ribbon tweeters.
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
- IslandPink
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10041
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Denbigh, N.Wales
#58 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
Yes, the prices are shocking now though. I'm just trying to order some other things for Jon alongside a pair of ZN's, and the metallised films from Mundorf etc are obscene prices.
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
-
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5600
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
#59 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
Yeah the price of caps shocked me - they're in the region of triple what they were last time I looked.
-
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5600
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
#60 Re: C3g Aikido Phono
How about a nice matched quad of these?
https://www.hificollective.co.uk/catalo ... r-max.html
https://www.hificollective.co.uk/catalo ... r-max.html