metric wierdy
#1 metric wierdy
we normally buy milk from the local mini market. It comes in standard 2 ltr plastic bottles.
yesterday Sandrine brought in a 4 pint bottle from Tesco and the 2 different sizes sat next to each other in the fridge.
I noticed the difference in size and saw that the 4 pint Tesco bottle had 2.27 ltrs written alongside the 4 pint .
ok, 4 (marked on label)pints is larger than 2 ltrs...but google says 1 pint is 0.472 litres, which is the same as saying 2.11 pints is a litre.
So, how can Tesco write on their milk bottles "4 pints 2.27 ltrs"????
did I get up too early this morning...should I go and have a lie down!
yesterday Sandrine brought in a 4 pint bottle from Tesco and the 2 different sizes sat next to each other in the fridge.
I noticed the difference in size and saw that the 4 pint Tesco bottle had 2.27 ltrs written alongside the 4 pint .
ok, 4 (marked on label)pints is larger than 2 ltrs...but google says 1 pint is 0.472 litres, which is the same as saying 2.11 pints is a litre.
So, how can Tesco write on their milk bottles "4 pints 2.27 ltrs"????
did I get up too early this morning...should I go and have a lie down!
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
-
- User
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 12:54 pm
- Location: Oxford
#2 Re: metric wierdy
When I try I find 1 pint equals 0.56826125 l, so 4 pints equals 2.273.
I think you had a US pint.
should I go and have a lie down! - Depends who with.
Cheers
Richard
I think you had a US pint.
should I go and have a lie down! - Depends who with.
Cheers
Richard
Last edited by Richard Higgins on Wed Jan 18, 2023 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
#3 Re: metric wierdy
Oh dear Ed, Google is not wrong if you want USA pints to litres!
And Tesco is right for GB pints.

And Tesco is right for GB pints.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
#4 Re: metric wierdy
1 imperial pint = 568.26125 millilitres
1 US liquid pint = 473.176473 millilitres
Its not the metric part that's being wierdy.
1 US liquid pint = 473.176473 millilitres
Its not the metric part that's being wierdy.
Little known fact, coherent thought can destructively interfere with itself leaving no thought at all, that’s why I prefer incoherent thought.
#5 Re: metric wierdy
Oh poo!
bloody usians
I do need to lie down
bloody usians
I do need to lie down
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
-
- Old Hand
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:08 pm
#6 Re: metric wierdy
You need a copy of "dealing with change" a 1971 HMSO publication. Americans have a different length for miles too.
#7 Re: metric wierdy
I thought the difference between a UK mile and a US mile was approx 3mm ?vinylnvalves wrote: ↑Wed Jan 18, 2023 3:30 pm You need a copy of "dealing with change" a 1971 HMSO publication. Americans have a different length for miles too.
In the UK the railways commonly still use miles and chains as a measure.
1 chain = 66ft and is the same length as a cricket pitch.
HS1 (and presumably HS2) is measured in metres.
EDIT.
The chain has been used for several centuries in England and in some other countries influenced by English practice. In the United Kingdom, there were 80 chains to the mile, but until the early nineteenth century the Scottish and Irish customary miles were longer than the statute mile; consequently a Scots chain was about 74 (imperial) feet, an Irish chain 84 feet. These longer chains became obsolete following the adoption of the imperial system of units in 1824.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
- jack
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5150
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ƃuıʌoɯ ƃuıɹǝpısuoɔ
- Contact:
#8 Re: metric wierdy
One of the hidden gems of Trafalgar Square is that in the 1870s the Board of Trade installed a whole load of brass inlays with the standard imperial measurements at the standard temperature of 62F. This was also done at the Guildhall and the Royal Observatory at Greenwich.
If you go to TS, look on the North side close to the steps. The original standard marks for imperial standard feet, yards, chains, perches etc. are all still there (though they have been moved a bit from their original position when the square was pedestrianized).
See https://londonist.com/london/videos/vid ... gar-square and many other references.
1 link = 7.92 inches (don't ask!)
25 links = 1 rod/pole/perch
100 links = 1 chain (22 yards)
10 chains/1000 links = 1 furlong
8 furlongs = 1 mile
If you go to TS, look on the North side close to the steps. The original standard marks for imperial standard feet, yards, chains, perches etc. are all still there (though they have been moved a bit from their original position when the square was pedestrianized).
See https://londonist.com/london/videos/vid ... gar-square and many other references.
1 link = 7.92 inches (don't ask!)
25 links = 1 rod/pole/perch
100 links = 1 chain (22 yards)
10 chains/1000 links = 1 furlong
8 furlongs = 1 mile
Vivitur ingenio, caetera mortis erunt
#9 Re: metric wierdy
Just googled that and found a link is also known as a gunters link, a 100 link, 66ft long measuring tool / chain.
All makes sense now..
The tube manual is quite like a telephone book. The number of it perfect. It is useful to make it possible to speak with a girl. But we can't see her beautiful face from the telephone number
- jack
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5150
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ƃuıʌoɯ ƃuıɹǝpısuoɔ
- Contact:
#10 Re: metric wierdy
It actually comes from "Gunter's Chain" (a surveying tool), which had 100 links... Gunter's Chain is 22 yards long (obviously) and had a hundred links (an early attempt at decimalisation), so that's where that particular bit of madness comes from. It's quite cute in that an area 10 chains x 10 chains = 10 acres, so to get the number of acres simply divide the number of square chains by 10.
If you want real weirdness, look up the reasons for American/US measurements being ever-so-slightly different...
As an aside, the reason for the three sets of brass inlays in different locations is that the original Imperial standard measurements were MADE OF WOOD (!!!) and were lost in a fire in the early 1800s and the BoT didn't want that to happen again... hence the use of brass and multiple locations.
Vivitur ingenio, caetera mortis erunt
-
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5258
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
#11 Re: metric wierdy
Just had a flashback to first year Surveying - we had to do a chain survey of the local streets in Bradford. That was amusing with all our friends passing. Terms from chain surveying are still used today 100s of years on - the surveyor's assistant is a Chainman and poles are still called ranging rods.
Then there was plane table surveying, another joy. I spent a day surveying the area around the Shearbridge pub. We didn't bother with breaks but I did need to answer the call so thought I'd pop in to the pub. Unfortunately they knew me well enough in there and before I'd got half way to the bar (the toilets were to the side) I was already having a pint of Teyleys pulled. This was no hardship as Nick will attest. Except later in the day I had to go again because of that, and had to drink another as a result. Those were the days.
.
Then there was plane table surveying, another joy. I spent a day surveying the area around the Shearbridge pub. We didn't bother with breaks but I did need to answer the call so thought I'd pop in to the pub. Unfortunately they knew me well enough in there and before I'd got half way to the bar (the toilets were to the side) I was already having a pint of Teyleys pulled. This was no hardship as Nick will attest. Except later in the day I had to go again because of that, and had to drink another as a result. Those were the days.

#12 Re: metric wierdy
I can see some circular results there. When was that BTW, wonder who was the licensee of the Shearbridge at the time.Except later in the day I had to go again because of that, and had to drink another as a result.
Little known fact, coherent thought can destructively interfere with itself leaving no thought at all, that’s why I prefer incoherent thought.
-
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5258
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
#13 Re: metric wierdy
Yes very circular. It was probably a good job I didn't first go till early afternoon. Would be around 87. Can't remember their names but they'd done Communications degrees I recall.
#14 Re: metric wierdy
87 might still be Jean and Colin, though maybe after them, If it was there would have been a racing sidecar outfit parked in the garage at the back of the pub.
Little known fact, coherent thought can destructively interfere with itself leaving no thought at all, that’s why I prefer incoherent thought.
-
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5258
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
#15 Re: metric wierdy
Don't recall ever seeing a racing sidecar, I'm sure I would have remembered that