Page 7 of 11

#91 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2022 9:20 am
by Nick
Must resist...

#92 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2022 9:32 am
by andrew Ivimey
Futile....

#93 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2022 9:55 am
by Ali Tait
Nick wrote: Fri Aug 26, 2022 9:09 am
Ali Tait wrote: Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:54 am No right one Simon. :D
That was Naked Gun. Just saying.

Well, you know what my memory is like. :-)

#94 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2022 6:41 pm
by RhythMick
Nick wrote: Fri Aug 26, 2022 9:09 am
Ali Tait wrote: Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:54 am No right one Simon. :D
That was Naked Gun. Just saying.

That clip still makes me spit my tea...

#95 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:00 am
by simon
Even such a simple amp has lots of bits. It's a Bugle - AC filaments and heaters, it's a long time since I've used AC filaments, hopefully it'll be quiet enough...
20221005_104954.jpg
20221005_104954.jpg (140.01 KiB) Viewed 4086 times
But first I need to debug it...

#96 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:51 am
by simon
Right. With AC disconnected from the 45 filament trafos and the GZ33 removed the 5751 heaters came up fine.

I added the GZ33 and the 5751 heaters and the HT came up fine.

Then I connected AC to the 45 filament trafos but with no 45s inserted and there was a proper flash, bang and a trace of magic smoke from the fuse holder in the IEC socket.

I've not seen this before and it looks to have damaged the fuse contacts in the socket. Quite impressive really.
20221005_113849.jpg
20221005_113849.jpg (162.21 KiB) Viewed 4080 times
This was a 2A glass bodied slow blow.

Continuity of the 45 filament trafos looks okay - but whilst writing this post I've realised I've wired the primaries and secondaries the wrong way round... which would do it.

So, a break first I think to clear my head, then find another IEC inlet and reconnect the filament trafos.

#97 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:59 am
by andrew Ivimey
Couldn't happen to me oh no - not even the slightest chance of something so careless and sloppy....nah, utterly impossible but ....wait a minute....what's that!?


Only kidding. Such tomfoolery just doesn't couldnt never ever ever happen in Bedford Towers - no sir eeeeee bob

#98 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 12:09 pm
by Nick
I've wired the primaries and secondaries the wrong way round
I too have done that once.

#99 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 1:17 pm
by Mike H
Image

#100 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 1:32 pm
by simon
There is a lesson here, something about not doing stuff whilst under the weather...

But thanks for your support chaps.

I'm wondering now if I might have taken the cathode resistors out, and the two resistors between the filament pins with the top of the cathode resistor at the middle to give a centre tap. Their voltage rating would no doubt have been exceeded, but it would only have been instantaneous. And hopefully I haven't shagged not the 45s...

#101 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 2:19 pm
by Nick
Its unlikely, don't know the values of the R's but assuming 45R, then maybe a voltage rating of 300v, that would need 6.6A, to get that current in the secondary would need 600A in the primary (assuming a 2.5:230 ratio) so I think the fuse would have done its job. And by the same reason, those R's would have prevented the secondary voltages getting to the point where the transformer would be damaged. I am optimistic.

#102 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 2:45 pm
by simon
I think you're referring to the two resistors across the filaments? If so, I was thinking that 240V up the 2.5V secondary might give 2400V across two half W resistors. I can't remember what the values are now, but something smallish like you say. I prefer your optimism :)

#103 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 3:07 pm
by Nick
Yep, but that's assuming that:

1. The voltage on the primary got to peak voltage before the fuse blew, its more likely that the inrush current took the fuse out before it got that high.

2. The power rating is based on actual dissipation of power, so there is a time element as well. The voltage would not be there for long enough for the resistor to start to heat up which is why I worried about the voltage rating of the resistor instead of the power rating.

The only thing I would worry about is I have seen metal film power resistors sometimes be killed by inrush into capacitors when between capacitors, they go open circuit, whereas an actual wire wound one is fine in the same situation. But that's simple to check with a ohm meter. But again, I would doubt the current would be high enough as it will be stepped down by the same ratio as the voltage is stepped up and the internal resistance of the secondary is likely to be the limiting factor there. BTW, I know there are pulse rating on MF resistors for that reason.

It may be optimism, but its not blind optimism.

#104 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 5:00 pm
by simon
Yes, I'm hoping that it was all instantaneous and the fuse blew before much could happen. I will have a poke around tomorrow with fresher eyes. I'm just back from the hospital so probably not a great idea now.

They're Takman carbon films, and the cathode resistor is a Mills wirewound BTW.

#105 Re: 45 SET

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 5:49 pm
by simon
I couldn't help myself, the resistors all check out - 42R for the centre tap resistors and 1k5 for the cathode resistors. Both 45 filaments have a little resistance too. So far so good.