Valve Amp Power Supplies

We all start somewhere
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15706
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#31 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by Nick »

Well, the delay is the rate a 50uf cap will discharge when loaded by 80ma. Remember you have put a current source as the load, so what you are seeing is the cap discharging. So not really of much direct relevance to the amps frequency response given it will never do that as a load to the cap. Well, I guess it will when you go from zero signal to full on signal, but its not going to happen in the space of a cycle of signal frequency.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10552
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#32 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by Cressy Snr »

Cheers Nick.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10552
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#33 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by Cressy Snr »

Getting too excited there. Regulators are to do with supply impedance. That much I know. :oops:
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10552
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#34 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by Cressy Snr »

Nick wrote: Sun Jan 23, 2022 9:47 pm Out of interest try shorting the 220r I can't see the point of any resistance you don't need in the supply to the output stage.
Removed the resistors and the bass performance has improved. Not in terms of slam or attack, but different bass instruments are better defined and more tuneful. It's not massive, but it is certainly worthwhile. A 6080 series regulator like the ones I had on my now almost forgotten 6B4G monoblocks, might improve things further I'd wager. That will have to wait for now but it'll get done before the summer.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5600
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#35 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by simon »

Removing the resistor also removed a second filter which would have significantly reduced ripple, but you haven't commented on this so perhaps wasn't audible?

I've often mused how small the ripple should be ideally. It can be chased in isolation, less is better right? But there are consequences - more R/C/L/filter stages - which aren't necessarily a good thing. "Just enough" is right I suppose.
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10552
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#36 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by Cressy Snr »

Well that’s the thing isn’t it. I’ve never figured out how much ripple should be removed passively and how much actively with a voltage reg, so I’ve all but abandoned trying.

Nick, Andrew, Mark, JamesD and Paul have by far the most experience in this field. I have very little. That’s the main reason I started this thread :)

There is still silence but no longer a palpable silence with this version. With the setup I had at the beginning I had never heard such quiet, if that makes sense. Difficult to describe.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
simon
Thermionic Monk Status
Posts: 5600
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#37 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by simon »

No I think I understand what you mean. And it seems to demonstrate the trade off - subjectively improved sound (less R in the supply) but at the cost of a very slight increase in background noise (less R in the supply).

I've spent a lot of time over the years going round in circles in PSUD trying to get low ripple and a fast step response. Some loads just didn't seem to lend themselves to this, or getting a quick response at all even, at least using the iron I already had.

Pretty much all the amps I've built have two filter stages as they're easy to get quiet. The one I do remember building with a single LC (plus small first cap to tune the HT) was the Bugle. And that kicked surprising butt for a 45SE. You might even have heard it on the old horns a long time ago Steve.
User avatar
IslandPink
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10041
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#38 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by IslandPink »

Shunt !
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10552
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#39 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by Cressy Snr »

IslandPink wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 12:59 pmShunt !
How dare you sir! Same to you! :mrgreen:
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5384
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#40 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by ed »

not sure how relevent this is, but back in the day I came to the conclusion that choke input was the way to go. This is 2008 and looking back I'm not sure if I understood it all back then..I certainly don't now...but with minimum understanding and armed with psud I discovered this:

from this
ps-572-mk1.jpg
ps-572-mk1.jpg (230.23 KiB) Viewed 9787 times
moving to this was a huge improvement
ps-572-mk2.jpg
ps-572-mk2.jpg (229.67 KiB) Viewed 9787 times
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15706
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#41 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by Nick »

Why would you decide the improvement (I assume its a heard improvement) was the result of the choke input instead of the change in B+ voltage?
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5384
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#42 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by ed »

yes there was a huge improvement in what I heard...
but I was chasing more voltage...
I think I was guilty of witnessing the removal of the ripple and immediately thinking that must be better, and that may have clouded what my ears were telling me....

so, in my defense, I wanted more volts and I wanted rid of that ripple....so objectively I had acheived both and subjectivity went out of the window.....until everybody else that heard it said it was the biz....

which of the two things actually brought the improvement I'll never know because I couldn't isolate the changes to 1 iteration. I'd like to think it was both changes in equal measure, but that's not very scientific and is at odds with good engineering practice.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15706
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#43 Re: Valve Amp Power Supplies

Post by Nick »

It would be interesting to see the effect of a step change in load, in theory the choke input should have greater regulation.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
Post Reply