Another speaker thread

Dedicated to those large boxes at one end of the room
steve s
Shed dweller
Posts: 2829
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 6:19 pm
Location: east yorks

#181 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by steve s »

Nick wrote: Sat Feb 06, 2021 2:42 pm Yes it does. But quality in terms of a resonant system. No other implied meaning.
Yes I see that nick, thanks
The tube manual is quite like a telephone book. The number of it perfect. It is useful to make it possible to speak with a girl. But we can't see her beautiful face from the telephone number
User avatar
Scottmoose
Needs to get out more
Posts: 1802
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:03 am
Contact:

#182 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Scottmoose »

You may find this interesting: http://web.archive.org/web/200809291142 ... Box-Q.html It's nominally in reference to sealed box systems, but you can simply replace 'Qtc' with '[effective] Qts' & apply to drive units.
'"That'll do," comes the cry of the perfectionist down the ages.' (James May The Reassembler)
Website www.wodendesign.com
Community sites www.frugal-horn.com & www.frugal-phile.com
steve s
Shed dweller
Posts: 2829
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 6:19 pm
Location: east yorks

#183 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by steve s »

Scottmoose wrote: Sat Feb 06, 2021 7:39 pm You may find this interesting: http://web.archive.org/web/200809291142 ... Box-Q.html It's nominally in reference to sealed box systems, but you can simply replace 'Qtc' with '[effective] Qts' & apply to drive units.
Thanks scott, that's interesting, page two being particularly informative.

Its also discussing system q, which I know is the important aspect rather than driver q.
Cheers..
The tube manual is quite like a telephone book. The number of it perfect. It is useful to make it possible to speak with a girl. But we can't see her beautiful face from the telephone number
User avatar
Scottmoose
Needs to get out more
Posts: 1802
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:03 am
Contact:

#184 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Scottmoose »

It is if you're building a sealed box, which was primarily what John was discussing; it doesn't really apply for vented etc. alignments (although keeping in mind the latter are 4th order systems you can extrapolate somewhat). However, for much of John's two pages, you can simply substitute 'Qts' for 'Qtc' if you're focusing purely on the drive unit, or using baffles that provide no effective air-mass loading or resonance. Just ensure it's effective Qts you use, i.e. Qts + any series R in circuit (either via loop resistance or amplifier output impedance).
'"That'll do," comes the cry of the perfectionist down the ages.' (James May The Reassembler)
Website www.wodendesign.com
Community sites www.frugal-horn.com & www.frugal-phile.com
User avatar
Ali Tait
Eternally single
Posts: 4373
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Galashiels

#185 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Ali Tait »

Vic’s been fiddling again-

https://www.trans-fi.com/diy-speaker-blog
User avatar
Ali Tait
Eternally single
Posts: 4373
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Galashiels

#186 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Ali Tait »

Been emailing with Vic, thought this picture of the measurements of the last few FR drivers he's used was worth putting up. As he points out, it's interesting to note the break up above 2k from all the wide range drivers he's tried, until he got to the Gallos and KEF's with tweeters. the KEF's look to measure pretty well, a very good result given you can get a pair on ebay for a hundred quid. He's done a few mods to them, nothing drastic though.

The graphs do not show the UM18 output.


Image
Ant
Shed dweller
Posts: 2332
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2017 6:45 pm
Location: Yorkshire

#187 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Ant »

I can remember mi dad having some of the original ones, kht 2001 i think about 20 years ago, a pair of the eggs and a sub.
I think the eggs stood on the window sill and the sub was somewhere out of the way
Always liked them, i always wondered what the uni q driver would have sounded like in a metronome. I had some q15 stand mounts which i really liked at the time

My q15 drivers ended up in a mates car parcel shelf. Wonder what happened to the kht eggs? The sub plate amp ended up in some open baffles with active bass drivers iirc
Also starring Rex Hamilton as Abraham Lincoln

www.bte-designs.weebly.com
User avatar
Scottmoose
Needs to get out more
Posts: 1802
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:03 am
Contact:

#188 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Scottmoose »

Right. Wideband drive units use TL (aka 'breakup', aka 'resonant') modes to produce the majority of their bandwidth. As far as bald mathematics goes this is for frequencies up to a point defined by Sd; for frequencies above that however piston behaviour should continue up to acoustic diameter of the voice coil, after which it transitions to TL modes running through or over the diaphragm. In practice not usually so pat as the above assumes a flat piston & cone shape, materials, additional stiffening structures etc. modify this.

The KEF is a multiway; the individual drive units are sized & optimised for operation over narrower bandwidths; the object is to avoid TL modes altogether by rolling off the main cone in the crossover & handing over to the tweeter which should not exhibit any significant bell modes etc. until well above 20KHz. Most wideband drive units attempt a mechanical equivalent -for example decoupling the main cone & using a sub-cone like a whizzer or central dustcap bonded to the end of the voice coil to handle the higher frequency range, with varying levels of success.
'"That'll do," comes the cry of the perfectionist down the ages.' (James May The Reassembler)
Website www.wodendesign.com
Community sites www.frugal-horn.com & www.frugal-phile.com
chris661
Shed dweller
Posts: 2556
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:29 am
Location: Sheffield

#189 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by chris661 »

Just a quick FWIW that I have a pair of Kef HTS3001SE on my desk (the SE versions have the "tangerine" phase plug). I sealed up the boxes and applied a big boost at 35Hz, plus a cut in the 150Hz range (probably the "chestiness" that Vic notes) and a couple of other response tweaks.

The results are excellent. Of course, they don't get loud before the 4.5" cones make unhappy sounds instead of bass. However, my listening distance is a couple of feet. I don't need loud. I just wanted a full-range point source.

For use at larger distances, I'm not surprised Vic doubled them up.

I'm very interested in Kef's more recent efforts, but all those square edges scream "diffraction" to me.

Chris

PS - Further to Scott's post, I generally prefer electrical crossovers to mechanical. The former is much easier to tweak and optimise.
User avatar
Ali Tait
Eternally single
Posts: 4373
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Galashiels

#190 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Ali Tait »

He’s also only running them down to 200hz.
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15706
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#191 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Nick »

Ali Tait wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:40 pm He’s also only running them down to 200hz.
Also, to be picky, the "Journey to No-Baffle Speaker System" has failed a bit given the two way Kef's are enclosed. He could have put a pair of LS3/5A's on the top.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
chris661
Shed dweller
Posts: 2556
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:29 am
Location: Sheffield

#192 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by chris661 »

Ali Tait wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:40 pm He’s also only running them down to 200hz.
True, but a bump at 150Hz will pull the acoustic crossover down, resulting in overlap.


Something that might be interesting would be to apply some FIR processing to the Kef eggs. In theory, square waves on & off axis should be possible - they're coaxial, after all.

Chris
User avatar
Ali Tait
Eternally single
Posts: 4373
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Galashiels

#193 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Ali Tait »

AFAIK he dropped the UM18’s to 120hz
User avatar
Ali Tait
Eternally single
Posts: 4373
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Galashiels

#194 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Ali Tait »

Nick wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 3:20 pm
Ali Tait wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:40 pm He’s also only running them down to 200hz.
Also, to be picky, the "Journey to No-Baffle Speaker System" has failed a bit given the two way Kef's are enclosed. He could have put a pair of LS3/5A's on the top.
Yep, that was true with the Gallo too. Can’t say he didn’t give it a fair go though. :)
Vangelo
User
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2020 9:43 am

#195 Re: Another speaker thread

Post by Vangelo »

Nick wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 3:20 pm
Ali Tait wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:40 pm He’s also only running them down to 200hz.
Also, to be picky, the "Journey to No-Baffle Speaker System" has failed a bit given the two way Kef's are enclosed. He could have put a pair of LS3/5A's on the top.
Yah....this is true Nick! I had no idea this is where I would end up (if its the final stop). I tried driver after driver trying to find one that didnt 'break up'.
I didnt realise the driver was the culprit thinking my system was so revealing it was showing up poor recordings.....so I didnt play stuff that sounded bad (most rock).

Then I took the departure to try something commercial. I tried to chose something in keeping with the 'no-baffle' theme, and something relatively efficient. Also, I was very afraid of choosing a box as I can always hear boxiness having used OB for so long. The Gallos fitted the bill!

Immediatley the break-up was gone, and I started playing my rock library which sounded great. So I knew I was on the right path. As you say, probably anything would work on top, altho I might have trouble driving the LS3.5A's.
Post Reply