Pete Millett ATEST
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12081
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#16
Has anyone here who's built a Pete Millett ATEST interface bothered fitting IC's U5 and U2 (14 pin devices) into sockets like the 8 Pin devices are?
Is there a reason this isn't a good idea?
DTB
Is there a reason this isn't a good idea?
DTB
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
#17
Yes, I did sockets for all of mine, never know what you might blow up when its test gear.
Interestingly, the data sheets say that some of the devices shouldn't be put into sockets...but hey ho...
Andrew
Interestingly, the data sheets say that some of the devices shouldn't be put into sockets...but hey ho...
Andrew
Analogue, the lost world that lies between 0 and 1.
- jack
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5144
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ƃuıʌoɯ ƃuıɹǝpısuoɔ
- Contact:
#18
Yes. Stray parasitic capacitance between the pins - generally, this is an issue normally only for very high slew rate amps - if you are trying to get every last ounce out of your system, trust yourself and solder to the PCB - Pete's design is quite specific about this. For reference, there is about 1pF between adjacent pins in a typical DIL socket...Dave the bass wrote:Has anyone here who's built a Pete Millett ATEST interface bothered fitting IC's U5 and U2 (14 pin devices) into sockets like the 8 Pin devices are?
Is there a reason this isn't a good idea?
If you absolutely MUST use sockets, make sure that they are hand-turned and made from pure, oxygen-free, silver that have been cryogenically treated and plated with 24ct Au.

HTH
Vivitur ingenio, caetera mortis erunt
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12081
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#19
Is it? I couldn't find anything relating to not socketing the 14 pin devices anywhere on his site or the mammoth 68 page thread! Erks!nickds1 wrote:Pete's design is quite specific about this.

I'm sure the ones from Maplins are all that...and more!nickds1 wrote:If you absolutely MUST use sockets, make sure that they are hand-turned and made from pure, oxygen-free, silver that have been cryogenically treated and plated with 24ct Au.
HTH

I trust my soldering skills... what I don't trust is me measuring things correctly and connecting things up correctly everytime using computers and DUT's and wires n stuff and actually understanding what I'm doing!
Thanks BTW Nick and Andrew.
Onwards!
DTB
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12081
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#21
You know I've been quiet recently.... wellDave the bass wrote:Dunno if anyone else has seen this but the December issue of 'Everyday Practical Electronics' has construction details of another USB Interface that might be interesting to some here too.

Ta dah!


Blummen works n'all!


I downloaded a 21 trial of measurement software that EPE featured, crikey its intense. Its called Virtins Multi Instrumment 3.3 Admitidly this is the 1st time I've played with measuring software but there's so much thats tripped me up eg. Why am I seeing two identical traces on the scope when I have different signals into Ch A + B... answer.... because you hadn't set the PC Windows driver to 'see' a 2 channel i/p Dave. Duh! Only took about 2 hours to suss that one.
Its all learning.
I might try the Audio Tester SW next that you fella's use with the Millet box.
DTB
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12081
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#23
The interface based around a PCM2902, trickiest little sausage I've ever soldered onto a PCB, SMT natch which I'm not geared-up for but do have a steady hand 
Windows sees it as a USB Stereo CODEC. Steep learning curve ...pah! Vertical more like! Just you wait until I learn what to do with it. Might be a long wait!
Its been projects a-go-go here recently, just finished an AK4396 DAC for the project room Touch and I've been trying to get an ESS9023 DAC to receive I2S from a CM6631a unsuccessfully, thats for another thread mind.
My beloved Weller TCP from 1982 has conked out too
I don't think it could stand the intense pace of my builds recently...
DTB

Windows sees it as a USB Stereo CODEC. Steep learning curve ...pah! Vertical more like! Just you wait until I learn what to do with it. Might be a long wait!
Its been projects a-go-go here recently, just finished an AK4396 DAC for the project room Touch and I've been trying to get an ESS9023 DAC to receive I2S from a CM6631a unsuccessfully, thats for another thread mind.
My beloved Weller TCP from 1982 has conked out too

DTB
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
- jack
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5144
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:58 pm
- Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ oʇ ƃuıʌoɯ ƃuıɹǝpısuoɔ
- Contact:
#24
Is that the "C" variant? The "A" and "B" are deprecated...Dave the bass wrote:The interface based around a PCM2902
http://www.ti.com/product/pcm2902c
Only has 48kHz sampling max - is that fast enough to detect and measure higher-frequency effects - even at base Nyquist levels, that's a top end of 24kHz which means that unless input filtering is used there will be in-band aliasing artefacts which will confuse your spectral and distortion analysis.
Ideally you want to be sampling at 96 or preferably 192kHz... the SNR will also be greatly improved by oversampling then digitally filtering -
Vivitur ingenio, caetera mortis erunt
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12081
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#25
Yeah, the C variant. I knew before I built it that its not exactly a hi-end bit of kit but it seems like a good simple way into USB linked multifunction measurements. I'll say again... I have NO experience in this area at all!
The sound card (M-Audio Transit 24/96) I'd like to use with the ATEST box is almost always in use here at work so I'd need to buy a 'proper' sound card at some time before I start using that in earnest.
DTB

The sound card (M-Audio Transit 24/96) I'd like to use with the ATEST box is almost always in use here at work so I'd need to buy a 'proper' sound card at some time before I start using that in earnest.
DTB
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
#26
I was going to start a new thread about Pete's ATEST but saw this and thought I'd ask my noob questions here for efficiency.
Both me and Thomas are new to this so prepare for some hand holding requests...
First of all, I want to shield the case and was originally going to get copper tape like this one
I assume I don't need one with conductive adhesive - or do I?
But then I read on this thread about the Ultraperm 80 stuff that Nick got which looks good too.
Which is the best bet and do we need to avoid bending the Ultraperm as with MuMetal?
Thanks.
Both me and Thomas are new to this so prepare for some hand holding requests...

First of all, I want to shield the case and was originally going to get copper tape like this one
I assume I don't need one with conductive adhesive - or do I?
But then I read on this thread about the Ultraperm 80 stuff that Nick got which looks good too.
Which is the best bet and do we need to avoid bending the Ultraperm as with MuMetal?
Thanks.
Jason
#27
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/M-Audio-Audio ... 4d1f0b24ecDave the bass wrote:Yeah, the C variant. I knew before I built it that its not exactly a hi-end bit of kit but it seems like a good simple way into USB linked multifunction measurements. I'll say again... I have NO experience in this area at all!![]()
The sound card (M-Audio Transit 24/96) I'd like to use with the ATEST box is almost always in use here at work so I'd need to buy a 'proper' sound card at some time before I start using that in earnest.
DTB
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12081
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#29
Bum, wasn't me. Thanks for the heads up James and Phil.
Jason, WRT screen. I seemed to have a lot of background noise without the screening so I bought but haven't installed yet some of that self adhesive Mu Metal sheeting Nick linked to. Since the good weather has been here I've not done much DIY-ing, I'm a foul-weather Fettler.
DTB
Jason, WRT screen. I seemed to have a lot of background noise without the screening so I bought but haven't installed yet some of that self adhesive Mu Metal sheeting Nick linked to. Since the good weather has been here I've not done much DIY-ing, I'm a foul-weather Fettler.
DTB
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
#30
Hi
Yes I too am the proud owner of a P Millett interface.
I am gathering some bits to make an inverse riaa from Morgan Jones 'building valve amplifiers'.
I too need a soundcard, to go with a vista laptop i've inherited. Presumably a 24/96? Any recommendations please?
Thanks
Thomas
Yes I too am the proud owner of a P Millett interface.
I am gathering some bits to make an inverse riaa from Morgan Jones 'building valve amplifiers'.
I too need a soundcard, to go with a vista laptop i've inherited. Presumably a 24/96? Any recommendations please?
Thanks
Thomas