Basic knowledge.
- pre65
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 21373
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.
#31
With reference to the above post and diagram, I'm getting confused.
If the 9v battery + goes to the pot wiper, and neg goes to grid (-9v bias) then does the signal go through the battery ?
If not does the input signal bypass the battery ?
Or am I just thick ?
This is because I'd rather not use an input capacitor.
If the 9v battery + goes to the pot wiper, and neg goes to grid (-9v bias) then does the signal go through the battery ?
If not does the input signal bypass the battery ?
Or am I just thick ?
This is because I'd rather not use an input capacitor.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
#32
The problem with that statement is the word "through". Just what do you think you mean by using it?If the 9v battery + goes to the pot wiper, and neg goes to grid (-9v bias) then does the signal go through the battery ?
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
- Paul Barker
- Social Sevices have been notified
- Posts: 8881
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
#33
The AC signal goes through the battery in the sense it goes through a capacitor. Perhaps batteries sound better than capacitors.
It's a little bit of a unnecesary worry when you consider what the battery is doing for you. It is eliminating a cathode resistor and bypass capacitor through which the signal passes also.
If you put the battery on the cathode as the bias the signal also goes through it, but people have found that using a battery in the fixed bias position the sound is better. You may say what is the difference? Shirley a battery on the cathode is fixed bias from another angle? The difference is the battery on the grid sees no current and it holds the grid dc potential absolutely "FIXED" (for the time constants relevant to audio, obviously it discharges over a very long time) whereas on the cathode the circuit is a battery charger, the battery is charged by the electrons passing through it and if those electron flows alter the battery voltage will alter ever so slightly. So it is not as fixed as a pure voltage reference battery as used in the schematic. Perhaps that explains the preferred (by proponents) sound of fixed bias?
It is less a matter of tying oneself in knots trying to find the theoretic minimal component count in the coveted "signal path" these days. The above schematic is simply how some people have enjoyed the results. I am using it at the moment.
It's a little bit of a unnecesary worry when you consider what the battery is doing for you. It is eliminating a cathode resistor and bypass capacitor through which the signal passes also.
If you put the battery on the cathode as the bias the signal also goes through it, but people have found that using a battery in the fixed bias position the sound is better. You may say what is the difference? Shirley a battery on the cathode is fixed bias from another angle? The difference is the battery on the grid sees no current and it holds the grid dc potential absolutely "FIXED" (for the time constants relevant to audio, obviously it discharges over a very long time) whereas on the cathode the circuit is a battery charger, the battery is charged by the electrons passing through it and if those electron flows alter the battery voltage will alter ever so slightly. So it is not as fixed as a pure voltage reference battery as used in the schematic. Perhaps that explains the preferred (by proponents) sound of fixed bias?
It is less a matter of tying oneself in knots trying to find the theoretic minimal component count in the coveted "signal path" these days. The above schematic is simply how some people have enjoyed the results. I am using it at the moment.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
-
- Shed dweller
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: From the land of the Bodgers
#34
It would be interesting to know if using a battery in the config Paul sketched out altered the frequency response of the stage vs battery in the cathode. Batteries are horribly non linear with frequency, impedance at DC can be very low but rises sharply there after, I suspect there would be some roll off depending on the battery and Millar capacitance... Maybe thats why some like the sound of this config.
#35
But in this case (what I wanted Phil to think about), next to nothing will go "through" the battery, I agree its like a cap, but in this case the only current that will actually flow (that which through can only mean) is charging and discharging the miller cap of the valve. In the case of a cap instead of the battery which will be followed with at least a grid resistor, then the signal will pass current as its loaded by the resistor(s) following it,The AC signal goes through the battery in the sense it goes through a capacitor. Perhaps batteries sound better than capacitors.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
-
- Shed dweller
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: From the land of the Bodgers
#36
Scratch that. Seems impedance only starts to become significant when in the MHz range...Neal wrote:It would be interesting to know if using a battery in the config Paul sketched out altered the frequency response of the stage vs battery in the cathode. Batteries are horribly non linear with frequency, impedance at DC can be very low but rises sharply there after, I suspect there would be some roll off depending on the battery and Millar capacitance... Maybe thats why some like the sound of this config.
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12273
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#37
Aaah! That interesting, so would it be fair to say then that a coupling capacitor of a known value is more predicable in its behaviour than say a battery in that position Phil is planning to use it in then? From reading the answers about the battery its seems a cap of an unknown quantity (and quality!) is being introduced into the signal path.Neal wrote: Scratch that. Seems impedance only starts to become significant when in the MHz range...
FWIW, I tried Batt-coupling/grid biasing a while ago and it sounded OK but nothing to go potty about in the project I used it in.
DTB
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
- pre65
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 21373
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.
#38
So, I've done a diagram.
A) is how I was going to do things, and B) is how (I think) Paul suggested.
A) is how I was going to do things, and B) is how (I think) Paul suggested.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
-
- Shed dweller
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: From the land of the Bodgers
#39
I would lean towards yes Dave. A battery has capacitance and its performance wont be as good as a capacitor. It would also have a lower impedance...the battery testing example I dug up on google suggested 3~4 ohms impedance at 10Khz for a lithium battery dipping down then a very sharp rise in the MHz range...a good polyprop capacitor should show a smooth falling impedance with rising frequency. But hey, in practice the battery may be better sounding!Dave the bass wrote:Aaah! That interesting, so would it be fair to say then that a coupling capacitor of a known value is more predicable in its behaviour than say a battery in that position Phil is planning to use it in then? From reading the answers about the battery its seems a cap of an unknown quantity (and quality!) is being introduced into the signal path.Neal wrote: Scratch that. Seems impedance only starts to become significant when in the MHz range...
FWIW, I tried Batt-coupling/grid biasing a while ago and it sounded OK but nothing to go potty about in the project I used it in.
DTB
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20157
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#40
The way I see it, it would be an AC signal with a fixed DC offset added to it, plus some aspect of capacitor like behaviour. Which will depend on the behaviour of the battery in response to a small AC current being applied.Nick wrote:But in this case (what I wanted Phil to think about), next to nothing will go "through" the battery, I agree its like a cap, but in this case the only current that will actually flow (that which through can only mean) is charging and discharging the miller cap of the valve. In the case of a cap instead of the battery which will be followed with at least a grid resistor, then the signal will pass current as its loaded by the resistor(s) following it,The AC signal goes through the battery in the sense it goes through a capacitor. Perhaps batteries sound better than capacitors.
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
- pre65
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 21373
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.
#42
Perhaps I need to try both ways.
Paul's way is more simplerist.
Paul's way is more simplerist.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
- Dave the bass
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 12273
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
- Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.
#43
I would, just to see.pre65 wrote:Perhaps I need to try both ways.
Paul's way is more simplerist.
(B) I think has a higher i/p Z . (A) effectively has that 220K in parallel with the pot lowering the i/p Z, I think.
DTB
"The fat bourgeois and his doppelganger"
- Paul Barker
- Social Sevices have been notified
- Posts: 8881
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
#44
I think we may be guilty reading too much into it.
I would say Phil's diagram one is inferior because it has both a coupling cap and the battery.
The only application I would consider that would beat the fixed battery bias is the unbypassed cathode resistor were that appropriate in the design.
I would say Phil's diagram one is inferior because it has both a coupling cap and the battery.
The only application I would consider that would beat the fixed battery bias is the unbypassed cathode resistor were that appropriate in the design.
Last edited by Paul Barker on Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
- IslandPink
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10041
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Denbigh, N.Wales
#45
Definitely try it both ways Phil - you might be surprised.
Please note that Stephen has been using battery in the grid circuit of his pre-amp for the last 5 years :
http://www.izzy-wizzy.com/audio/preampnew.html
As Nick was saying, the audibility of a battery is strongly linked to how much current modulation there is through the battery - in the case of the grid loop , very little .
Please note that Stephen has been using battery in the grid circuit of his pre-amp for the last 5 years :
http://www.izzy-wizzy.com/audio/preampnew.html
As Nick was saying, the audibility of a battery is strongly linked to how much current modulation there is through the battery - in the case of the grid loop , very little .
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"