Amp No 46

What people are working on at the moment
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10834
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#61 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Cressy Snr »

Oh dear.
IMG_0601.jpeg
IMG_0601.jpeg (164.47 KiB) Viewed 24519 times
The transformer transplant has turned into a major rebuild.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
Daniel Quinn
Old Hand
Posts: 926
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:19 am

#62 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Daniel Quinn »

A screwdriver storage box , best use for a valve amp🤣
Last edited by Daniel Quinn on Tue Jan 07, 2025 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10834
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#63 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Cressy Snr »

Indeed! 😂
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
andrew Ivimey
Social Sevices have been notified
Posts: 8541
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:33 am
Location: Bedford

#64 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by andrew Ivimey »

I've started using a dell optiplex p.c. as a 'collecting bin' to take to the re-cycling centre. First by crushing a broken de humidifier on top, took it off resolving that it should be merely the 'hat' on top of whatever electronic crap I've got; laptop psus , dvd player, multipurpose handset, several kilos of ptfe covered oxygen free copper wire, a couple of guitar valve amp chassis, a couple of homemade similar, a partridge and eight svetlana 6550s ( crunch!) a multimeter, a nine band shortwave radio, a hadron collider and a pair of 300bs.

But I still like what Steve is doing!
Philosophers have only interpreted the world - the point, however, is to change it. No it isn't ... maybe we should leave it alone for a while.
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10834
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#65 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Cressy Snr »

Rebuild completed:
IMG_0604.jpeg
IMG_0604.jpeg (165.58 KiB) Viewed 24080 times
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10834
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#66 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Cressy Snr »

Haven’t seen the turntable for a week:
IMG_0606.jpeg
IMG_0606.jpeg (116.53 KiB) Viewed 23854 times
Apart from that, the headphone system is now back up and running and sounding fine.
The system is louder for the same volume setting than before, possibly indicating a different step down ratio with the Pre II output transformers and maybe some degree of difficulty driving the 16R headphone impedance.
The Hammonds drive the headphones well on the 16R secondary as expected.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10834
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#67 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Cressy Snr »

I've changed the valves to EH 6H30Pi. This valve produces slightly smoother treble than the ECC99. Very small difference but noticeable on my headphones. Below is the audio circuit and power supply:
6H30Pi HPA.png
6H30Pi HPA.png (30.84 KiB) Viewed 22867 times
6H30Pi HPA PSU.png
6H30Pi HPA PSU.png (40.28 KiB) Viewed 22867 times
Last edited by Cressy Snr on Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10834
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#68 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Cressy Snr »

I've collected a few bits from Simon, so a 45 headphone amp is now firmly on the cards. I'll get onto that at some point down the line and start a new thread.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
simon
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6020
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

#69 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by simon »

Can't wait to see how that works out Steve, got to love 45s
User avatar
Paul Barker
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9904
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Scarborough

#70 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Paul Barker »

Or, looking at thread title?

Image

I would say that pair is a rare bargain and only UK postage costs.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10834
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#71 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Cressy Snr »

Another week and another mod. The input stage is now choke loaded, using one Hammond 156C, 150H choke per channel:
IMG_0607.jpeg
IMG_0607.jpeg (127.23 KiB) Viewed 20311 times
This necessitated making a new board from black perspex to mount the chokes on and cutting a hole in the bottom of the cabinet to provide access to the electronics for testing purposes. I also had to change a few component values in order to be able to fit the downsized components under the perspex plate. I'm using 0.22uF Russian PIO green caps because they had a smaller diameter than the Obbligato 0.33uF caps from before. Also the bypass cap on the input stage was reduced to 100uF, giving a -3dB cutoff of 5Hz, which is good enough.
The valves are 6N6P as opposed to the previous 6H30Pi so that I wouldn't saturate the 8mA capable choke. We're looking at 8.3mA through the choke, which is close enough.
Choke Loaded HPA.png
Choke Loaded HPA.png (32.59 KiB) Viewed 20311 times
Last edited by Cressy Snr on Sun Jan 26, 2025 8:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10834
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#72 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Cressy Snr »

The sound quality has taken another step up. Nice.
All bodes well for the 45 HPA.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
Paul Barker
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9904
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Scarborough

#73 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Paul Barker »

Looks good but the bypass cap is small.

Ive calced a single hammond choke at 20hz below and two series chokes at 20hz. On the basis of the load Id use two in series. Dont forget two chokes in series half the capacitance. This is also better.

Ive also used my spread sheet I wrote to calculate the frequency -3db in both options for a 100 uF cap.

I’d raise the cap value.

Image
Image
Image
Image
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
User avatar
Paul Barker
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9904
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Scarborough

#74 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Paul Barker »

Sorry in the spread sheet I named the valve wrongly.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
User avatar
Paul Barker
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9904
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Scarborough

#75 Re: Amp No 46

Unread post by Paul Barker »

Also, when calculating the gain the choke load impedance is parallel with 220k.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
Post Reply